Ukraine’s political battlefield has opened up at a time when its real battlefield remains under attack.
Former Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov has called for Ukraine to restore democratic elections despite the ongoing war with Russia, delivering what is arguably the most serious political challenge to President Volodymyr Zelensky since Russia launched its full-scale invasion.
In a video released on Tuesday, Fedorov argued that Ukraine should not allow Russia’s invasion to permanently suspend its democratic institutions.
“Democracy cannot be held hostage by Russia,” the 35-year-old said, insisting that Ukraine was fighting to preserve its identity as a free European state.
His intervention has immediately reignited one of Ukraine’s most politically sensitive questions: can a country fighting for its survival safely hold a national election while missiles and drones are still falling on its cities?
Fedorov Breaks His Silence
Fedorov did not mention Zelensky directly in his address, but the timing and content of his remarks leave little doubt about the political significance of his intervention.
He was unexpectedly removed as defence minister in July, only about six months after taking the position. His dismissal triggered protests in parts of the country, with supporters demanding that he be restored to the post.
The former minister had reportedly been offered alternative positions within government, including a role as deputy prime minister responsible for military innovation. He rejected the idea of returning in another capacity, making it clear that he wanted his old defence portfolio back.
Now, rather than simply demanding his reinstatement, Fedorov has broadened the argument into a call for institutional and political reform.
He warned that Ukraine was facing a “systemic crisis of governance” and criticised a political culture in which loyalty could allegedly matter more than competence.
According to Fedorov, Ukraine needs institutions that are stronger than individual politicians.
That message inevitably places the spotlight on Zelensky.
The Election Dilemma
Ukraine has been under martial law since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022. Under Ukrainian law, national elections cannot take place while martial law remains in force.
Zelensky’s five-year presidential term formally expired in May 2024. However, the continuation of martial law means he has remained in office rather than handing power to a successor through an election.
The issue has repeatedly attracted international attention.
Former US President Donald Trump previously accused Kyiv of using the war as a reason to avoid elections. Zelensky responded at the time that Ukraine could organise a vote within 60 to 90 days if its allies could provide the necessary security guarantees.
But that proposition is far easier to discuss politically than to implement on the ground.
Ukraine remains under regular Russian missile and drone attacks. Millions of Ukrainians have also been displaced, while large numbers of citizens are serving in the military or living abroad.
Organising polling stations, registering voters, protecting election officials and ensuring that soldiers, displaced people and citizens living outside Ukraine can participate would represent an enormous logistical challenge.
And there is an even bigger question: how free can an election truly be when one side is fighting an active war and large areas of the country remain vulnerable to attack?
Zelensky’s Camp Pushes Back
Fedorov’s proposal has already divided opinion, including among people who previously supported his return to the defence ministry.
A source within Zelensky’s presidential office described the idea as unrealistic, questioning the wisdom of organising elections while Ukraine continues to face missile and drone attacks.
Oleksandr Merezhko, a lawmaker aligned with Zelensky, said he supported Fedorov’s return as defence minister but disagreed strongly with his election proposal.
He argued that holding a vote during the war could weaken national unity and resilience and potentially benefit Russian President Vladimir Putin.
But opposition voices see the issue differently.
Opposition MP Volodymyr Aryev argued that Ukraine had reached a point where it needed to choose between elections and what he described as political chaos.
That disagreement captures the dilemma at the heart of the debate.
For Zelensky’s supporters, elections during wartime could fracture a country that needs unity to defeat Russia.
For his critics, continuing indefinitely without a national vote risks weakening democratic legitimacy.
Protests Add To The Pressure
Fedorov’s intervention came as demonstrations continued outside Ukraine’s parliament.
About 100 protesters gathered on Wednesday, demanding his return to the defence ministry and calling for greater dialogue between the government and the public.
Some of the protesters were young Ukrainians who had become supporters of Fedorov during his time in government.
Their frustration is significant because Fedorov represented something different from Ukraine’s traditional political establishment.
Before becoming defence minister, he served as minister of digital transformation and became one of the prominent faces of Ukraine’s technology-driven wartime strategy.
He helped develop the country’s digital infrastructure for warfare and was involved in the creation of the so-called IT Army of Ukraine, a volunteer cyber initiative launched after Russia’s invasion.
He also played a central role in the Army of Drones fundraising campaign, which helped supply Ukraine’s armed forces with unmanned systems.
His approach was built around technology, speed and unconventional warfare.
As defence minister, he continued pushing drones, innovation and modern military procurement.
His supporters credit him with helping Ukraine adapt to a rapidly changing battlefield.
His removal therefore represented more than the departure of another minister to many of his young supporters. It was viewed as a possible retreat from the innovative approach that had made him popular.
A Political Threat Without A Presidential Declaration
Interestingly, Fedorov has not said that he intends to challenge Zelensky in a presidential election.
He has not announced a political party, declared a presidential campaign or openly positioned himself as an opposition candidate.
But his latest intervention has nevertheless changed the conversation around his political future.
By calling for a mechanism to restore democratic elections during the war, he has moved beyond his personal dispute with the government.
He placed himself at the centre of a much bigger national debate.
His argument is essentially this: Ukraine cannot claim to be defending democracy while indefinitely postponing the democratic process.
The counterargument is equally powerful: a democracy cannot function properly if its citizens cannot vote safely because they are being bombed.
That is the political paradox Ukraine now faces.
And Russia Is Still Attacking
The debate is unfolding against a backdrop that makes the election question even more difficult.
Russian forces continue to launch attacks across Ukraine. In the latest assault, four people were reportedly killed when a drone struck a minibus in the southern city of Kherson.
The city has repeatedly come under attack, with drivers and passengers among those killed in previous strikes.
At the same time, Ukraine continues its own attacks against Russian targets.
For Kyiv, the war is therefore not a distant security concern that can simply be paused for an election. It remains an immediate and deadly reality.
That reality strengthens the argument of those who believe elections should wait.
But it also gives urgency to Fedorov’s warning that wartime conditions should not permanently become an excuse for political stagnation.
Fedorov’s Bigger Message
Perhaps the most important part of Fedorov’s intervention is not the question of whether Ukraine should vote tomorrow, next year or after the war.
It is his broader warning about how power is exercised during wartime.
You May Like: AI To Help Planes Avoid Climate-Warming Contrails In £5m UK Trial
He criticised what he described as a system where political loyalty could become more important than professionalism and results.
For a country that has sacrificed enormously since Russia’s invasion, that is a potentially explosive argument.
Ukraine is fighting not only to retain territory but to preserve its political identity and its place in Europe.
That creates an uncomfortable question for Zelensky’s government: At what point does protecting democracy require restoring the democratic process, even when doing so carries enormous risks?
For now, there is no easy answer.
Ukraine remains under martial law, the war continues and Zelensky’s government has shown no indication that a presidential election will be held while the current security conditions persist.
But Fedorov’s intervention has ensured that the question will no longer sit quietly in the background.
The war may have postponed Ukraine’s elections.
It has not postponed the argument over what Ukrainian democracy should look like when the war eventually ends.